SPREAD - Sharing Practices Rigorously, Easily Accelerates Delivery
Reply
Email a Friend
I am seeing some guidance for supporting data to what/where regions, areas, or specific well types, have stepped to stand out from conventional standard well design i.e. 30" x 20" x 13-3/8" x 9-5/8".
e.g. Opting to hole-enlarge wells, or drill with more optimal non standard bits/casing sizes, in order to deliver a more cost effective, efficient and >loss free, well delivery.
What was the driver, for change? What key hazards and risk did you believe would be better addressed? What were the results?
Any guidance to a before and after case example that can be referenced, also appreciated.
Peter.
Discussion Forum » Drilling Operations » Optimal: hole enlargement and/or non standard drilling designs?
( View related discussions at the bottom)
Posted on: 01 Dec 2010, 03:14 PM Last reply on:09 Dec 2010, 03:05 PMNo. of responses: 1
- Companyrep
- Drilling Consultant
- Organisation: Norwell
- Total posts: 141
- Join date: Jan 2005
Peter Aird
To reply .. or to see the replies from others .. please
login!
If you're not registered, please register... It's FREE
If you're too busy to do either, then mail to dave@relentlesspursuit.co.uk and we'll do it for you.
If you're not registered, please register... It's FREE
If you're too busy to do either, then mail to dave@relentlesspursuit.co.uk and we'll do it for you.
home
Login
